An Interfaith Perspective on Globalization for the Common Good

Abstract

The third Annual International Conference on Globalization for the
Common Good was held on 27-31 March 2004 at the Bustan Rotana hotel, Dubai, the United Arab Emirates. More than thirty participants, representing
academics, peace activists, theologians, environmentalists, and businessmen
from the United States, Europe, Japan, the Gulf region, Australia,
and South Africa attended the eleven plenary sessions. These were divided
under the following headings: Muslim-Christian Dialogue for the Common
Good; Religions and Social Justice; Profit and the Common Good: Conflict
or Convergence?; Religions and the Common Good; Urbanization and
Cities in a Global Age; Globalization and Civilizations; Ethical
Perspectives on Globalization; Interfaith Dialogue and Peace-building;
Natural Resources, Ecology and Development; Youth in a Global Age; and
Science and Technology in a Global Age. The conference was officially
opened by the founder and chief convenor of the Interfaith Perspective on
Globalization for the Common Good, Dr Kamran Mofid of the United
Kingdom.
Dr William Lesher (Lutheran School of Theology, Chicago) in his
“Pathways to Peace” identified the major factors supporting globalization
and showed how global trends become indigenized through the process of
glocalization. Sister Beatrice Mariotti’s (St. Mary’s Catholic High
School, Dubai) “Globalization and Christian-Muslim Spiritual Dialogue
in Dubai” dealt with three challenges to cultural identity: consumerism,
the Internet, and isolationism. Markus Glatz-Schmallegger (Catholic
Social Academy of Austria) argued in his “Religions Acting for ‘Bridging
and Linking Social Capital’ in the Context of Globalization,” that religion,
as an organ of civil society, can contribute significantly to social
capital.
In the session on “Profit and the Common Good: Conflict or Convergence?”
Kamran Mofid outlined both the negative and positive aspects of
globalization. This was followed by a lively discussion on how globalization’s
benefits could be extended to all and not confined to a minority of
individuals, multinationals, and states. Suleman Dangor (University of
Kwazulu-Natal, South Africa) outlined the positive and negative features
of globalization, and then elaborated on the role that religions could play
in ensuring that its benefits are spread equitably while developing nations
are protected from its negative impact.
Jakob von Uexkull (The Right Livelihood Awards, London, UK), in his
“Global Values and Global Stability,” made a case for equitable access to
the world’s natural resources. The possibility of this happening is greater
now that we are moving to a post-secular world. Keyvan Tabari emphasized
the importance of national sovereignty. Since the demise of the USSR ...